Why Editors Should Rule the World

October 7, 2008
By

Editors should rule the world because good ones prevent smart people from looking like idiots.

I live with an engineer. In our house are professional and academic journals that do such painfully awful things to the English language I’ll find myself tempted to phone up a publisher to offer to take a red pen to their draft publication for no pay at all.

Pointed out to me by the man this morning, a drop quote in OR/MS Today*:

“There is a recurring theme that a body of data analysis skills exist that are uniquely analytics.”

A drop quote. Pulled out and highlighted in large, coloured text. Now, sure. This sentence, as written, might make for a good zinger of a question on a Grade 10 English test. Maybe even a bonus question. “Analytics” is, after all, not a plural. But in an academic publication? Simply unacceptable.

* It’s the publication of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences.

Tags: ,

  • http://www.nhoj.com John Markos O'Neill

    I would say something like, “These cultural references imply that data analysis skills are not merely a useful set of tools, but a cohesive discipline called analytics.”

  • http://www.kimwerker.com kpwerker

    Hired!

  • spinstah

    Oh, try this: “The sensemakers may not be sure what to handoff in the earlier stages of sensemaking since sensemaking is not complete”

  • http://www.kimwerker.com kpwerker

    What's that now?

  • http://www.spinstah.net/blog spinstah

    Oh, try this: “The sensemakers may not be sure what to handoff in the earlier stages of sensemaking since sensemaking is not complete”

  • http://www.kimwerker.com Kim Werker

    What's that now?

  • Pingback: Why Editors Should Rule the World | Kim Werker



Buy My Books

I wrote these. Perhaps you'd like one? Or two?

Support Me, Buy Indie

I'm an affiliate partner with Powells. If you buy books from this stupendous indie bookstore, you help support my writing. Thank you for it!
Powell's books