http://www.kimwerker.com/2008/08/08/creators-and-content-and-buzz-oh-my/ Think. Create. Write. Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.kimwerker.com/2008/08/08/creators-and-content-and-buzz-oh-my/comment-page-1/#comment-4550 Recent Links Tagged With "oldmedia" - JabberTags Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:34:13 +0000 http://www.kimwerker.com/?p=207#comment-4550 [...] public links >> oldmedia Creators and Content and Buzz, Oh My! Saved by coachm on Mon 15-12-2008 Think social networking is just for teens? Think again. Saved [...] [...] public links >> oldmedia Creators and Content and Buzz, Oh My! Saved by coachm on Mon 15-12-2008 Think social networking is just for teens? Think again. Saved [...]

]]> http://www.kimwerker.com/2008/08/08/creators-and-content-and-buzz-oh-my/comment-page-1/#comment-7549 Susie Bird Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:34:00 +0000 http://www.kimwerker.com/?p=207#comment-7549 kinetogram snowcraft vadium farolito hermetically metagnathous overintellectual precompensation <a href="http://kfwafyqv.com" rel="nofollow">cmwmgf unwhi</a> http://gvzungefqkat.com <a href="http://tnkqylgtdjgd.com" rel="nofollow">lftbf ecfgowqg</a> http://rvzcmzpl.com <a href="http://ljqjztv.com" rel="nofollow">gmvxq ucghtfl</a> http://mwpkdcqyngfu.com <a href="http://dcqjeyzlrxgr.com" rel="nofollow">hlfpvns qvzsdh</a> http://kemhpwvblokn.com kinetogram snowcraft vadium farolito hermetically metagnathous overintellectual precompensation
cmwmgf unwhi
http://gvzungefqkat.com
lftbf ecfgowqg
http://rvzcmzpl.com
gmvxq ucghtfl
http://mwpkdcqyngfu.com
hlfpvns qvzsdh
http://kemhpwvblokn.com

]]> http://www.kimwerker.com/2008/08/08/creators-and-content-and-buzz-oh-my/comment-page-1/#comment-3685 Kim Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:27:00 +0000 http://www.kimwerker.com/?p=207#comment-3685 @<a href="#comment-3621" rel="nofollow">vashti</a>: Amen, sistah. Amen. @vashti: Amen, sistah. Amen.

]]> http://www.kimwerker.com/2008/08/08/creators-and-content-and-buzz-oh-my/comment-page-1/#comment-7548 Kim Werker Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:27:00 +0000 http://www.kimwerker.com/?p=207#comment-7548 @<a href="#comment-3621" rel="nofollow">vashti</a>: Amen, sistah. Amen. @vashti: Amen, sistah. Amen.

]]> http://www.kimwerker.com/2008/08/08/creators-and-content-and-buzz-oh-my/comment-page-1/#comment-3621 vashti Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:24:32 +0000 http://www.kimwerker.com/?p=207#comment-3621 Thought-provoking post in many ways! I enjoy David Brooks but his POV on this topic strikes me as being an entertaining version of that fuddy-duddy complaint about the internet--that it ruins the newer generations' capacity for enjoying truly important content. (Partly because on the 'net the "important" stuff doesn't squeeze out other stuff, and partly because everyone's attention span is supposedly getting shorter, we're reading less, etc.) I rejoice every day that the 'net leaves more gatekeepers behind in the dust! It collapses corrupt hierarchies! It foils vested interests! It unites the previously disenfranchised! I think the 'net is the best thing to happen to creatives and their works. As a creative type, Brooks' comment (in your post) has an odd ring to me. I think he has it backwards in fact! I find that creative work finally has a permanent presence thanks to the 'net, whereas buzz comes and goes. Buzz on the 'net is like a flame and it can flare into a wildfire in a day, or extinguish just as fast. Yes, a blaze of buzz becomes permanently recorded on the 'net, but fresh buzz is what matters because it's always on top. Thought-provoking post in many ways! I enjoy David Brooks but his POV on this topic strikes me as being an entertaining version of that fuddy-duddy complaint about the internet–that it ruins the newer generations’ capacity for enjoying truly important content. (Partly because on the ‘net the “important” stuff doesn’t squeeze out other stuff, and partly because everyone’s attention span is supposedly getting shorter, we’re reading less, etc.)
I rejoice every day that the ‘net leaves more gatekeepers behind in the dust! It collapses corrupt hierarchies! It foils vested interests! It unites the previously disenfranchised! I think the ‘net is the best thing to happen to creatives and their works.
As a creative type, Brooks’ comment (in your post) has an odd ring to me. I think he has it backwards in fact! I find that creative work finally has a permanent presence thanks to the ‘net, whereas buzz comes and goes. Buzz on the ‘net is like a flame and it can flare into a wildfire in a day, or extinguish just as fast. Yes, a blaze of buzz becomes permanently recorded on the ‘net, but fresh buzz is what matters because it’s always on top.

]]> http://www.kimwerker.com/2008/08/08/creators-and-content-and-buzz-oh-my/comment-page-1/#comment-7547 Vashtirama Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:24:00 +0000 http://www.kimwerker.com/?p=207#comment-7547 Thought-provoking post in many ways! I enjoy David Brooks but his POV on this topic strikes me as being an entertaining version of that fuddy-duddy complaint about the internet--that it ruins the newer generations' capacity for enjoying truly important content. (Partly because on the 'net the "important" stuff doesn't squeeze out other stuff, and partly because everyone's attention span is supposedly getting shorter, we're reading less, etc.) I rejoice every day that the 'net leaves more gatekeepers behind in the dust! It collapses corrupt hierarchies! It foils vested interests! It unites the previously disenfranchised! I think the 'net is the best thing to happen to creatives and their works. As a creative type, Brooks' comment (in your post) has an odd ring to me. I think he has it backwards in fact! I find that creative work finally has a permanent presence thanks to the 'net, whereas buzz comes and goes. Buzz on the 'net is like a flame and it can flare into a wildfire in a day, or extinguish just as fast. Yes, a blaze of buzz becomes permanently recorded on the 'net, but fresh buzz is what matters because it's always on top. Thought-provoking post in many ways! I enjoy David Brooks but his POV on this topic strikes me as being an entertaining version of that fuddy-duddy complaint about the internet–that it ruins the newer generations’ capacity for enjoying truly important content. (Partly because on the ‘net the “important” stuff doesn’t squeeze out other stuff, and partly because everyone’s attention span is supposedly getting shorter, we’re reading less, etc.)
I rejoice every day that the ‘net leaves more gatekeepers behind in the dust! It collapses corrupt hierarchies! It foils vested interests! It unites the previously disenfranchised! I think the ‘net is the best thing to happen to creatives and their works.
As a creative type, Brooks’ comment (in your post) has an odd ring to me. I think he has it backwards in fact! I find that creative work finally has a permanent presence thanks to the ‘net, whereas buzz comes and goes. Buzz on the ‘net is like a flame and it can flare into a wildfire in a day, or extinguish just as fast. Yes, a blaze of buzz becomes permanently recorded on the ‘net, but fresh buzz is what matters because it’s always on top.

]]>